Recruiting
Phase 2

Ivosidenib & Enasidenib, Azacitidine, Venetoclax

Sponsor:

Alice Mims

Code:

NCT05401097

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Eligibility Criteria

Sex: All

Age: 18+

Healthy Volunteers: Not accepted

Interventions

Azacitidine

Biopsy

Enasidenib

Ivosidenib

Venetoclax

Study Details

Brief summary:

This phase II study compares the order of treatment with ivosidenib or enasidenib and azacitidine plus venetoclax in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia with genetic changes in the IDH1 or IDH2 genes (IDH mutated). Ivosidenib is in a class of medications called isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) inhibitors. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells. Enasidenib is in a class of medications called an IDH2 inhibitor. It also works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Azacitidine is in a class of medications called demethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells. This study may help researchers determine which treatment order is best for older patients with IDH mutated acute myeloid leukemia: 1) ivosidenib or enasidenib followed by azacitidine plus venetoclax; or 2) azacitidine plus venetoclax followed by ivosidenib or enasidenib.

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study ID

NCT05401097

Start date

Sep 13, 2022

Status verified date

Jun, 2026

Completion date

Jun 30, 2029

Anticipated

Primary completion date

Sep 30, 2027

Anticipated

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

Sex: All

Age: 18+

Healthy Volunteers: Not accepted

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with newly diagnosed IDH1 or IDH2 mutated AML
  • Not a candidate for or refuses intensive induction therapy
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
  • Creatinine clearance > 40 ml/min
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 5 x upper limit of normal
  • Total bilirubin < 1.5 x upper limit of normal (except for patients with Gilbert's disease)
  • At the time of Venetoclax initiation, white blood cells (WBC) needs to be < 25 × 103 microliter: Hydroxyurea can be used to achieve that level.
  • For female patients of childbearing potential, willingness to abstain from heterosexual intercourse or use a protocol-recommended method of contraception from the screening visit throughout the study treatment period and for 6 months following the last dose of either study drug. A serum pregnancy test will be done at screening. A serum or urine pregnancy test will be done on Day 1 of each cycle for women of childbearing potential. If the urine pregnancy test is positive, a serum pregnancy test must be performed per institutional standards.

The following methods are acceptable methods of contraception for the purpose of this study:

  • Highly Effective Contraception Methods that can achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly are considered as highly effective birth control methods (Clinical Trials Facilitation Group 2014):

  • Combined (estrogen and progestin containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal).
  • Progestin-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable).
  • Intrauterine device.
  • Intrauterine hormone-releasing system.
  • Bilateral tubal occlusion.
  • Vasectomized partner, provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the female study participant and that the vasectomized partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success.
  • Sexual abstinence- only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study treatments. The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical study and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient.
  • Acceptable Birth Control Methods that are not Highly Effective Contraception Acceptable birth control methods that result in a failure rate of more than 1% per year:

  • Progestin-only oral hormonal contraception, where inhibition of ovulation is not the primary mode of action.
  • Male or female condom with or without spermicide.
  • Cap, diaphragm, or sponge with spermicide. A combination of male condom with either cap, diaphragm, or sponge with spermicide (double barrier methods) are also acceptable, but not highly effective, birth control methods.
  • The following methods are NOT acceptable methods of contraception for the purpose of this study:

  • Periodic abstinence (calendar, symptothermal, postovulation methods).
  • Withdrawal (coitus interruptus).
  • Spermicides only.
  • Lactational amenorrhea method.
  • Combination of male and female condom
  • For male patients of childbearing potential having intercourse with females of childbearing potential, the willingness to abstain from heterosexual intercourse or use a protocol recommended method of contraception from the screening visit throughout the study treatment period and for 3 months following the last dose of either study drug. Males must also refrain from sperm donation from the screening visit throughout the study treatment period and for 3 months following the last dose of either dose of study drug

  • Willingness to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan, imaging studies, laboratory tests, other study procedures and study restrictions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • Known active central nervous system involvement of leukemia
  • Any active malignancy requiring therapy, that would interfere with the interpretation of study endpoints.
  • Evidence of ongoing uncontrolled systemic bacterial, fungal or viral infection at the time of start of study treatment
  • Uncontrolled infection with hepatitis C, hepatitis B, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Concurrent participation in an investigational drug trial with therapeutic intent defined as prior study therapy within 14 days prior to study treatment
  • Inability to tolerate oral medications including symptomatic disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function such as inflammatory bowel disease or resection of stomach or small bowel

Study Design

Enrollment

125 participants

Anticipated

Allocation

Randomized

Intervention Model

Sequential

Primary purpose

Treatment

Interventions and Outcome Measures

Arms

experimental: Arm A (IDHi+Aza followed by Ven+aza)

For IDH1 mutated AML patients randomized to first-line therapy with IDHi+aza, patients will receive Ivosidenib 500mg po orally daily on Days 1-28 of each 28 day cycle. For IDH2 mutated AML patients randomized to first-line therapy with IDHi+aza, patients will receive Enasidenib 100mg po orally daily on Days 1-28 of each 28 day cycle. Azacitidine will be given to both groups intravenously or subcutaneously at 75mg/m2 daily on days 1-7, or 1-5/8-9, or days 1-4/7-9 of each 28-day cycle.Subsequent cycles after CR/CRi/CRh/MLFS achievement may be adjusted in timing and dosing.

experimental: Arm B (Ven+aza followed by IDHi+aza)

For both IDH1 and IDH2 mutated AML patient randomized to first-line therapy with Ven+aza, patients will receive venetoclax dosing with the ramp-up and dosing per the FDA-label (based off of concurrent drug interactions). Azacitidine will be given intravenously at 75mg/m2 daily on days 1-7, or 1-5/8-9, or days 1-4/7-9 of each 28-day cycle. Subsequent cycles after CR/CRi/CRh/MLFS achievement may be adjusted in timing and dosing.

Interventions

Azacitidine

Given IV or SC

Biopsy

Undergo biopsy of the bone marrow

Enasidenib

Given PO

Ivosidenib

Given PO

Venetoclax

Given PO

Primary outcome measure

  • Overall treatment failure [ Time Frame: At 12 months from date of randomization ]

Central Contacts and Locations

Central contacts

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

800-293-5066OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu

Locations

University of Colorado

Recruiting

Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80205

Contacts

Principal Investigator:

Mathew Angelos, MD, PhD

UNC Hospitals, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Recruiting

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514

Contacts

Principal Investigator:

Joshua Zeidner, MD

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Recruiting

Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210

Contacts

Principal Investigator:

Alice S. Mims, MD

UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Recruiting

Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235

Contacts

Principal Investigator:

Yazan Madanat, MD

More Information

Sponsor

Alice Mims

Last update posted

Jun 23, 2026

Last verified

Jun, 2026

Trial information was received from ClinicalTrials.gov and was last updated on 2026-09-09. This information was provided to ClinicalTrials.gov by Alice Mims on 2026-06-23.