Recruiting

Resection with Mapping

Sponsor:

Erasmus Medical Center

Code:

NCT06273176

Conditions

Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype

Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma Multiforme of Brain

Astrocytoma, Malignant

Brain Neoplasms

Eligibility Criteria

Sex: All

Age: 0 - 70+

Healthy Volunteers: Not accepted

Interventions

Awake mapping under local anesthesia

Asleep mapping under general anesthesia

Resection under general anesthesia without mapping

Study Details

Brief summary:

Resection of glioblastoma in or near functional brain tissue is challenging because of the proximity of important structures to the tumor site. To pursue maximal resection in a safe manner, mapping methods have been developed to test for motor and language function during the operation. Previous evidence suggests that these techniques are beneficial for maximum safe resection in newly diagnosed grade 2-4 astrocytoma, grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma, and recently, glioblastoma. However, their effects in recurrent glioblastoma are still poorly understood. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of awake mapping and asleep mapping with no mapping in resections for recurrent glioblastoma.

This study is an international, multicenter, prospective 3-arm cohort study of observational nature. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will be operated with mapping or no mapping techniques with a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery and 2) residual tumor volume of the contrast-enhancing and non-contrast-enhancing part as assessed by a neuroradiologist on postoperative contrast MRI scans. Secondary endpoints are: 1) overall survival (OS), 2) progression-free survival (PFS), 4) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year.

The study will be carried out by the centers affiliated with the European and North American Consortium and Registry for Intraoperative Mapping (ENCRAM).

Conditions

Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype

Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma Multiforme of Brain

Astrocytoma, Malignant

Brain Neoplasms

Study ID

NCT06273176

Start date

Jan 1, 2023

Status verified date

Feb, 2024

Completion date

Jan 1, 2028

Anticipated

Primary completion date

Jan 1, 2027

Anticipated

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

Sex: All

Age: 0 - 70+

Healthy Volunteers: Not accepted

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years
2. Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma
3. Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract, speech areas or visual areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II)19
4. The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon)
5. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline
2. Multifocal contrast-enhancing lesions
3. Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker)
4. Inability to give written informed consent
5. Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma
6. Clinical data unavailable for the newly diagnosed setting

Study Design

Enrollment

225 participants

Anticipated

Interventions and Outcome Measures

Arms

Awake mapping

Awake mapping: Tumor resection with intraoperative awake motor or language mapping

Asleep mapping

Asleep mapping: Tumor resection with intraoperative asleep motor mapping

No mapping

No mapping: Tumor resection without intraoperative mapping

Interventions

Awake mapping under local anesthesia

During an awake craniotomy, the patient is awake and cooperative during the resection of the tumor while the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

Asleep mapping under general anesthesia

During asleep mapping under general anesthesia, the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping with evoked potentials (MEPs, SSEPs or continuous dynamic mapping) to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

Resection under general anesthesia without mapping

During resection under general anesthesia without mapping, the surgeon does not use any intraoperative stimulation mapping techniques to identify eloquent areas.

Primary outcome measure

  • Residual volume [ Time Frame: Within 72 hours postoperatively ]
  • Neurological morbidity at 6 weeks [ Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively ]

Central Contacts and Locations

Central contacts

Locations

University of California, San Francisco

Recruiting

San Francisco, California, United States, 94143

Massachusetts General Hospital

Recruiting

Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114

More Information

Sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Last update posted

Feb 22, 2024

Last verified

Feb, 2024

Keywords

  • Glioblastoma
  • Recurrent
  • Re-resection
  • Resection
  • Intraoperative mapping
  • Awake mapping
  • Awake craniotomy
  • Asleep mapping
  • Motor mapping
  • Language mapping
  • Overall survival
  • Progression-free survival
  • Neurological morbidity
  • Quality of life
  • Functional area
  • Eloquent
  • Extent of resection
  • Residual tumor volume

Trial information was received from ClinicalTrials.gov and was last updated on 2026-09-10. This information was provided to ClinicalTrials.gov by Erasmus Medical Center on 2024-02-22.